However, we are proof that strong general intelligence exists. No one knows how to make an AGI, and no one knows if it’s even possible to create one. Something referred to as the hard problem of consciousness. We have no idea what gives rise to human consciousness, which would be a core emergent feature of an AI. The fact is, we wouldn’t even know where to start to make an AGI. ![]() Unless it’s somewhere in a secret laboratory somewhere, that is. This is “strong” AI or AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), essentially an artificial entity that is at least equal and would most likely surpass us.Īs far as anyone knows there is no real-world example of this “strong” AI existing. They can learn to do anything, function in any situation, and generally do anything a human can, often better. If you think of movie AIs such as HAL 9000, the T-800, Data from Star Trek, or Robbie the Robot, they are seemingly conscious intelligences. Strong AI Doesn’t Exist Sarunyu L/ĪI that’s equivalent or superior to human intelligence doesn’t exist outside of fiction. While these systems, especially ones that focus on machine learning, can produce unpredictable results, they aren’t at all like human intelligence. Sometimes different narrow AI systems are combined to form a more complex system, but the result is still effectively narrow AI. Fast forward to the first computer to beat a human at Go, AlphaGo, and its orders of magnitude smarter, but still only good at one thing.Īll of the AI you encounter, use, or see today is weak. ![]() The first computer to beat a human being at chess, Deep Blue, was totally useless at anything else. This means that a specific AI system is very good at doing just one or a narrow set of related tasks. The AI we have today is commonly referred to as “weak” or “narrative” AI. While we might feel like we intuitively know intelligence when we see it, it turns out that drawing a neat circle around the idea of intelligence is tricky! The Age of Weak AI Is Here In other words, the details of intelligence, both natural and artificial, are still evolving. Some theories, such as Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences have been thoroughly debunked, while there is lots of evidence to support a general intelligence factor in humans (referred to as the “ G Factor“). We aren’t even sure how human intelligence works under the hood. If you have a DSA key, it should work exactly the same like RSA.We still have a lot to learn about intelligence in humans, despite having many different ways of measuring intelligence. (The same public key in PEM format can be extracted with openssl rsa -pubout, but it will be of little use.) ![]() You can extract the public key in OpenSSH id_rsa.pub format (for putting into authorized_keys) with: ssh-keygen -y -f joeuser.key > joeuser-ssh.pub The same format is used by Open SSH, and you can use ssh -i joeuser.key to connect. In Open SSL, this format is called "PEM" (as in -outform pem) and is used by default. MGECAQACEQCxQaFwijLYlXTOlwqnSW9PAgMBAAECEETwgqpzhX0IVhUa0OK0tgkCĬQDXPo7HDY3axQIJANLRsrFxClMDAghaZp7GwU2T1QIIMlVMo57Ihz8CCFSoKo3F Look at the insides of joeuser.key and check if it looks kinda like this: -BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY. Since X.509 uses standard RSA keys, and so does SSH, you should be able to just tell your SSH client to use joeuser.key - the only requirement is that it be in an understandable format. Let's assume you have an user's SSL certificate in joeuser.pem and its private key in joeuser.key. Or, if you already have a SSH key in id_rsa, just use it with OpenSSL when signing a CSR. ![]() TL DR summary: If you have a SSL/X.509 certificate+key, just give the private key file to ssh.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |